<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Economy Experts: What About Savings?</title>
        <link>http://economy.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/what-about-savings.php?rss=1</link>
        <description></description>
        <language>en</language>
        <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:30:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
        <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
       
        <item>
            <title>What About Savings?</title>
            <description><![CDATA[<p>There has been widespread speculation that the credit crisis and the recession would lead to a long-term shift in household saving. And saving did rise from the very low levels before 2008 and increased more or less steadily through this spring. But as the "green shoots" improvement in the economy took hold, saving has been dropping, and fell to 3 percent in August. Will this continue, and is it an unequivocal good thing? Low saving was alternately credited during the boom and blamed during the bubble. Will saving need to rise to very high levels, as many economists have argued, to erase deficits, and what are the implications for growth if it does (or interest rates, if it doesn't)?</p>]]></description>
            <link>http://economy.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/what-about-savings.php?rss=1</link>
            <guid>http://economy.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/what-about-savings.php?rss=1</guid>

            <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
        </item>
		
		
			<item>
				<title>Desmond Lachman responded on October  5, 09 01:56 PM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=expertblogs;series=economy;medium=rss;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=expertblogs;series=economy;medium=rss;tile=2;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" width="300" height="250" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Last year&rsquo;s Great Panic abruptly reminded US baby-boomers  how ill- prepared they are for retirement. Following that Panic, there would now  seem to be a number of compelling reasons to expect the US  saving rate to steadily increase over the next few years from its presently low  level by historic standards.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The most compelling of these reasons is that  US household balance sheets have been  seriously impaired by years of unusually low saving rates and by the ravages of  the financial crisis. In this context, one has to be struck by the fact that  US household debt today amounts to  approximately 135 percent of US household incomes, or more than double the ratio  that prevailed in the late 1980s. At the same time, despite the substantial  bounce in equity prices from their March 2009 lows, US  household wealth is some US$12 trillion, or around 85 percent of GDP, lower than  it was at the start of 2008 as a result of substantially lower US home and  equity prices.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A second reason for expecting US households  to attempt to increase their saving rate is the high degree of job insecurity  that presently characterizes the US labor market and that is widely  expected to continue characterizing that market in 2010 as the economy  experiences a very sub-par recovery. Including part-time workers unable to find  full-time employment, the US unemployment rate has already  risen to a staggering 16 &frac34; percent. At the same time, the extraordinarily large  gaps in the US labor market are resulting in an  extraordinary squeeze in household income growth as illustrated most vividly by  declining wages over the past year.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; A third reason for expecting higher  US household savings is that  the US consumer is now highly credit  constrained. Mortgage Equity Withdrawal, which in the housing market&rsquo;s boom  years reached a peak of 8 percentage points of US household income in 2005-2006, has now totally  evaporated as a direct result of the US housing bust. At the same time,  consumer card credit and home equity lines have been reduced substantially and  there is every expectation that consumer credit will continue to be cut in 2010  as part of the financial system&rsquo;s ongoing attempt to strengthen its capital  position.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An increase in US household income is to be welcomed as part of  the adjustment process of the large US external payment imbalances. It is  also to be welcomed as an important source of financing for the extraordinarily  large US budget deficits that are in  prospect for many years to come. However, if a higher US household saving rate  is not to thwart the nascent recovery in the US and world economies, it will  need to be accompanied by policies promoting higher consumption in China,  Germany, and Japan, the world&rsquo;s high savings countries. If recent history offers  any guide, one would not want to hold one&rsquo;s breath waiting for those countries  to promote household consumption. </p>...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://economy.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/what-about-savings.php?rss=1#1369599</link>
				<guid>http://economy.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/what-about-savings.php?rss=1#1369599</guid>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 17:56:56 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		
			<item>
				<title>Charles Calomiris responded on October  5, 09 10:26 AM</title>
				<description>

					
&lt;div class="ad" style="float:right;margin: 0px, 0, 10, 10;"&gt;
&lt;h6&gt;Advertisement&lt;/h6&gt;
&lt;a href="http://ad.doubleclick.net/jump/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=expertblogs;series=economy;medium=rss;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;img src="http://ad.doubleclick.net/ad/nationaljournalgroup/njonline;feature=expertblogs;series=economy;medium=rss;tile=2;sz=300x250;ord=123456789?" width="300" height="250" border="0" alt=""&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;



					<![CDATA[
I think there is a good case  to be made for a protracted period of above-average savings from disposable  income. As I pointed out the last time we discussed this topic, savings behavior  is a forward-looking decision about building (or rebuilding) wealth. Therefore,  it will depend crucially on employment, income growth, and asset prices. If the  economy grows slowly coming out of the recession, and job growth is delayed, and  asset prices remain flat, savings out of disposable income will remain high  as&nbsp;workers&nbsp;protect themselves from the unknown and try to rebuild their  retirement wealth through savings from disposable income. I see this as a likely  scenario for the next&nbsp;several years (say, 2% real growth on average, a stock  market that trends upward at a similarly low rate, and job growth that is weaker  and slower than the recoveries from the past two recessions). The reason for  this forecast is simple: the current Administration is pursuing anti-growth  policies that will keep the economy weak. These include higher income tax rates,  wasteful spending that does little to promote growth, new carbon taxation, new  healthcare taxation, and anti-free trade policies that have gone from a neutral  posture to an aggressively negative&nbsp;one. Even if the Administration only ends up  winning on half of its agenda, that will produce devastating consequences for  growth. There may be high income growth in 2010 (an adjustment to more normal  levels of&nbsp;construction and inventories could raise growth to above 3% in 2010),  which will be financed mainly by&nbsp;corporate profits, but the recovery will not  have legs. Small businesses, already&nbsp;suffering from a lack of credit, will be  especially vulnerable to the new taxes. Small businesses are the bulk of the  economy and they are already lagging behind large businesses in job creation  and&nbsp;growth -- a trend that is likely to gather more steam over the next months  and years. Beyond the next three years, it is reasonable to expect the  political&nbsp;pendulum&nbsp;to swing back, as it did in the 1980s, but it will take time  for that to happen, and in the meantime slow growth in income, jobs and asset  prices, combined with the all-but-inevitable acceleration of inflation, will  encourage people to save at much higher rates than in the past.
&nbsp;
...]]>
				</description>
				<link>http://economy.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/what-about-savings.php?rss=1#1369322</link>
				<guid>http://economy.nationaljournal.com/2009/10/what-about-savings.php?rss=1#1369322</guid>
				<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:26:27 GMT</pubDate>
			</item>
		


       
    </channel>
</rss>
 